European Court of Human Rights

European Court of Human Rights Presentation The motivation behind case at the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), is to look at supposed infringement and guarantee that States Parties conform to their commitments under the Convention, furnishing singular candidates with powerful cures and only fulfillment under Articles 13 and 41 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The more extensive target is to secure and install locally the three CoE establishment stones; liberal pluralist majority rule government, human rights and the standard of law to impact auxiliary and institutional change and make a typical fair and legitimate territory all through the entire of the mainland. However involved 47 part states and 811 million residents, the CoE possesses an on a very basic level diverse regional degree to that in May 1949. Initially a social and ideological partner to NATO, it has experienced a focal move in its center usual way of doing things from an interstate procedure of ensuring the majority rule personality of Member States with the help of human rights to its developing bleeding edge job as a judge of liberal human rights thanks to singular request. Significant issues that take steps to sabotage what has been accomplished over the fifty years during which the Convention has worked lead one to ask whether there is any point taking such cases whatsoever. This concise paper is part in two segments. Segment one examinations the tripartite issue sketched out inside PACE Resolution 1226 (2000); the deficient lucidity and casuistical nature of Court decisions, portrayed by doctrinal vulnerability in the edge of gratefulness; the fundamental non-usage of decisions and inability to utilize vital changes that would stay away from further infringement, with a contextual investigation of the Russian Federation; and a study of the inadequate meticulousness and disappointment of the Committee of Ministers (CoM) to apply enough weight when directing the execution of decisions. Segment two, investigates the focal discussion among individual and established equity; and the potential effect Protocol 14 may have on the asphyxiating6] Court and CoM. At long last I evaluate the achievements of Strasbourg case before returning emphatically to our underlying inquiry with an energetic body of evidence for singular appeal against the setting of a tide of human rights maltreatment in post-socialist increase Europe; the utility of the Interlaken recommendations; and conservation of the Human Rights Act 1998. Area One: Problems Hypothetical Fault Lines: An Unprincipled Margin The degree to which there is any point to Strasbourg prosecution is resolved in the primary occurrence by the degree to which the Court can successfully adjust its job as a supranational legal underwriter of liberal maverick human rights, inside the CoE structure of maintaining and conceding to the string of pluralist popular government; an inherently aggregate perfect. For McHarg, Strasbourg law is described by the nonappearance of a theoretical structure incorporating an ideal rights model with a solid origination of the open intrigue. Greer concurs, featuring uncertain regulating, institutional, and adjudicative inquiries, and the disappointment of the Court to convey a solid assortment of law and protected power. The outcome standard, slight choices and un-requested interpretive standards, best case scenario debasing Convention rights and best case scenario denying them. This division is happened through the edge of thankfulness convention; the scope given to States Parties dependent on their better situation with the realities on the ground. ECHR insurances are not supreme, however relative; they are dependent upon exemptions allowing encroachment of the major right or opportunity, explicitly characterized inside passage two of Articles 8-11; and under Article 15 (A15) can be deleted out and out to the degree carefully required by the exigencies of the circumstance. These express definitional limitations help us to remember Bentham; this, we see, is stating nothing: it leaves the law similarly as free and liberated as it discovered it. Severe legal translation and objectivity are basic to the resistance of Convention rights with regards to these exemptions. The adaptability of the edge is for Waldock worthwhile to the evolutive idea of Strasbourg Jurisprudence, and for Dr Arai-Takahashi esteem pluralism being the basic essential and ideals of a liberal popularity based society, a lot of normalized rules would cheapen territorial authenticity and wealth of social qualities and conventions among part states. The CoE is clear in its mean to advance mindfulness and energize the improvement of Europes social personality and diversity.That Convention rights are relative is a debatable issue for pragmatist scholars, since States Parties could never have been eager to be limited by the Convention in any case without defending their vote based sway. However McHarg takes note of the oddity in a lawful plan which should ensure the person against the group, endorsing restrictions to rights on aggregate grounds. How far practically speaking does the ECtHR go towards satisfying the administrative capacity it alludes to in Handyside v UK (1976)? How much does Osts declaration that there will never be an unchallengeable edge remain constant? McHarg discusses doctrinal vulnerability while Jones brings up that even the Courts president has recognized the defense somewhat of analysis of the regulations absence of exactness and use without principled gauges. Fiercer pundits lambast the relinquishment of the Courts implementation obligation. Dembour questions if Convention rights are so brimming with inconsistencies that they are pointless? It is characteristic for the polarity between global individual rights assurances and the national aggregate intrigue that the edge of gratefulness possesses a center situation among subjectivity and objectivity; between a weight of confirmation immovably on the administration on one hand and on the other of wide yielding to it. In Lawless v. Ireland (1961), Waldock attested: a Governments release of obligations is an issue of acknowledging complex factors and adjusting clashing contemplations of the open intrigue; when the Court is fulfilled that the gratefulness is on the edge the intrigue the open itself has in viable Government and support of request legitimizes and requires a ruling for the lawfulness of the Governments appreciation; Simpson saw this mirroring a verifiable assurance to back the specialists. Dembour and Jones individual appraisals of further A15 disparagements show reliably respectful utilizations of the edge, and hesitance to dispassionately examine the presence of a crisis or of the measures executed to handle it. In Greece v. Joined Kingdom (1958), the Commission contended that the evaluation whether an open risk undermining the life of the country existed is an issue of gratefulness; deciding the legitimacy of the oppressive estimates utilized, the UK government appreciated a specific circumspection. Such a position is obviously apparent in Ireland v. Joined Kingdom (1978), affirmed in Brannigan v. McBride (1993), both concerning A15 disparagements of Article 5 with respect to the confinement of suspects in Ireland. A few issues emerge from the method of reasoning utilized in these cases. Dembour causes us to notice the nonattendance of a really and hypothetically exacting examination difficult to legitimize in human rights terms. Without a doubt, the certainty of a wide edge with regards to A15 disparagements, drove Judge Martens to declare that there is no support for leaving a wide edge in light of the fact that the Court, being the final hotel defender, is called upon to carefully investigate each criticism. Jones fights a highly sensitive situation dispassionately definite if a national government has proof of such a circumstance, he inquires as to why this isn't fit for appraisal by a worldwide Court? Usage: A cynical view is all around established Strasbourg law has exhibited the ability of the Court to vigorously maintain Convention rights from significant shows of assertion, guaranteeing a level of equity for candidates and families, universal consideration, responsibility comparable to genuine infringement, and local administrative change. Despite the noteworthiness of such supranational choices, examination of the pending caseload (somewhere in the range of 116,800 cases in October 2009), uncovers a Court confronting unreasonable weight from tedious cases worried about auxiliary issues in common, criminal and managerial procedures; genuine inescapable human rights mishandles; and unsuitable deferrals in the usage of decisions. Usage remains the Achilles impact point of the Convention framework, A concise contextual analysis of Russia underscores the gravity of the circumstance. It is the incongruity of history that the Russian Federation presently possesses a key situation in the very association built up to give European solidarity and security even with Soviet socialism. Containing 27.3% (31,850) of every single pending application at the ECtHR, the Medvedev Government faces extended difficulties in its endeavors to create common and financial opportunities finishing the lawful agnosticism that is truly thwarting present day advancement. I compose following the passing in Butyrka jail of Sergei Magnitsky, an enemy of defilement attorney representing HSBC/Hermitage Capital in the $230m charge misrepresentation case. This case and the continuous second Khordokovsky preliminary are significant of auxiliary imperfections in the Russian criminal equity framework and procuratura that have lead to the allegation and imprisonment of numerous blameless people. Other significant cases exhibit the gravity of the circumstance, including Gusinskiy v Russia, Ilascu and Others v Moldova and Russia, the initial six Chechen cases, Shamayev and 12 others v Russia and Georgia and Aleksanyan v Russia. Leutheusser-Schnarrenbergers late PACE report on politicall

Technology Effects Essay Example for Free

Innovation Effects Essay â€Å"The reality is we didn’t manage everything well until photography made its mark. At that point movies in the mid twentieth century. Radio. TV. Things started to have a mass. † This explanation that Captain Beatty made while having a discussion with Guy Montag, was expressing how the general public had changed once the innovation developed. Fahrenheit 451 is for the most part about the impacts of innovation and its consequences for humankind. It is additionally includes the subject, oversight, however that didn't have a lot of impact on the general public as innovation did. Truth be told it was a direct result of the abuse of innovation, oversight was in any event, being centered around. In this general public houses have parlor dividers and in Montag’s house three of the parlor dividers are secured with’ divider screens’ or huge TV that covers the whole divider. Montag’s spouse, Mildred, scarcely ever quits watching them. Mildred’s most loved projects are the shows that included contents she was given a content with the goal that she could ‘become’ a piece of the shows from her own lounge room. Individuals in this general public even considered the entertainers on these projects their ‘family’. One day Montag was debilitated and he couldn’t handle the commotion of the parlor, so he requested that his better half turn it off. Indeed, even in a circumstance like that she had dismissed his solicitation and answered, â€Å"That’s my family. † The TV isolates one from the remainder of the world. It even replaces the significance of what family really is. The general public doesn't understand how this pointless machine is spellbinding individuals in hazardous manner. Still there is an oversight that states claiming and perusing books are illicit. That doesn't impact one-fourth of the general public, in light of the fact that nobody possesses energy for it in any case. Most of the general public is too bustling staying aware of all their TV programs. That is what is truly influencing the individuals. In Fahrenheit 451, TV isn't the main innovation item that disconnects somebody from every other person. Shell Radios do it moreover. A shell radio is an ear gadget that produces quiet sea sounds all through the whole day. An individual diverted with the unwinding of this can't consider anything. Also, in light of the fact that they can’t hear different sounds , they don’t need to associate with others. It permits them to be in their own reality. With a gadget like the shell radio, it isn't sensible to have a restriction thought that the individuals don’t have the opportunity to think. It isn't that they really don’t have the opportunity to think rather, they are basically not setting aside a few minutes. In the event that the shell radio was not created they almost certain would have had the option to think more.

Situational Theory of Leadership

Situational Theory of Leadership Theories Print The Situational Theory of Leadership By Kendra Cherry facebook twitter Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Learn about our editorial policy Kendra Cherry Reviewed by Reviewed by Amy Morin, LCSW on October 01, 2019 facebook twitter instagram Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist, author of the bestselling book 13 Things Mentally Strong People Dont Do, and a highly sought-after speaker. Learn about our Wellness Board Amy Morin, LCSW on October 01, 2019 Chris Ryan / Getty Images More in Theories Behavioral Psychology Cognitive Psychology Developmental Psychology Personality Psychology Social Psychology Biological Psychology Psychosocial Psychology In This Article Table of Contents Expand 4 Primary Leadership Styles Maturity Levels Leadership Styles and Maturity Flexible Leadership Model SLII Model SLII Leadership Styles Situational Factors View All Back To Top The situational theory of leadership suggests that no single leadership style is best. Instead, it all depends on the situation at hand and which type of leadership and strategies are best-suited to the task. According to this theory, the most effective leaders are those that are able to adapt their style to the situation and look at cues such as the type of task, the nature of the group, and other factors that might contribute to getting the job done. Situational leadership theory is often referred to as the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, after its developers, Dr. Paul Hersey, author of The Situational Leader, and Kenneth Blanchard, author of One-Minute Manager. Hersey and Blanchard’s Leadership Styles Hersey and Blanchard suggested that there are four primary leadership styles: Telling (S1): In this leadership style, the leader tells people what to do and how to do it.Selling (S2): This style involves more back-and-forth between leaders and followers. Leaders sell their ideas and message to get group members to buy into the process.Participating (S3): In this approach, the leader offers less direction and allows members of the group to take a more active role in coming up with ideas and making decisions.Delegating (S4): This style is characterized by a less involved, hands-off approach to leadership. Group members tend to make most of the decisions and take most of the responsibility for what happens. Maturity Levels The right style of leadership depends greatly on the maturity level (i.e., the level of knowledge and competence) of the individuals or group. Hersey and Blanchards theory identifies four different levels of maturity, including: M1: Group members lack the knowledge, skills, and willingness to complete the task.M2: Group members are willing and enthusiastic, but lack the ability.M3: Group members have the skills and capability to complete the task, but are unwilling to take responsibility.M4: Group members are highly skilled and willing to complete the task. Matching Leadership Styles With Maturity Levels The Hersey-Blanchard model suggests that the following leadership styles are the most appropriate for these maturity levels: Low Maturity (M1)â€"Telling (S1)Medium Maturity (M2)â€"Selling (S2)Medium Maturity (M3)â€"Participating (S3)High Maturity (M4)â€"Delegating (S4) A Flexible Leadership Model A more telling style may be necessary at the beginning of a project when followers lack the responsibility or knowledge to work on their own. As subordinates become more experienced and knowledgeable, however, the leader may want to shift into a more delegating approach. This situational model of leadership focuses on flexibility so that leaders are able to adapt according to the needs of their followers and the demands of the situation. The situational approach to leadership also avoids the pitfalls of the single-style approach by recognizing that there are many different ways of dealing with a problem and that leaders need to be able to assess a situation and the maturity levels of subordinates in order to determine what approach will be the most effective at any given moment. Situational theories, therefore, give greater consideration to the complexity of dynamic social situations and the many individuals acting in different roles who will ultimately contribute to the outcome. The SLII Model The Situational Leadership II (or SLII model) was developed by Kenneth Blanchard and builds on Blanchard and Herseys original theory. According to the revised version of the theory, effective leaders must base their behavior on the developmental level of group members for specific tasks. The developmental level is determined by each individuals level of competence and commitment. These levels include: Enthusiastic Beginner (D1): High commitment, low competence.Disillusioned Learner (D2): Some competence, but setbacks have led to low commitment.Capable But Cautious Performer (D3): Competence is growing, but the level of commitment varies.Self-Reliant Achiever (D4): High competence and commitment. SLII Leadership Styles SLII also suggests that effective leadership is dependent on two key behaviors: supporting and directing. Directing behaviors include giving specific directions and instructions and attempting to control the behavior of group members. Supporting behaviors include actions such as encouraging subordinates, listening, and offering recognition and feedback. The theory identifies four basic leadership styles, including: Directing (S1): High on directing behaviors, low on supporting behaviors.Coaching (S2): High on both directing and supporting behaviors.Supporting (S3): Low on directing behavior and high on supporting behaviors.Delegating (S4): Low on both directing and supporting behaviors. The main point of SLII theory is that not one of these four leadership styles is best. Instead, an effective leader will match his or her behavior to the developmental skill of each subordinate for the task at hand. Important Situational Factors Experts suggest that there are four key contextual factors that leaders must be aware of when making an assessment of the situation. These factors include: Leaders need to consider the relationship between the leaders and the members of the group. Social and interpersonal factors can play a role in determining which approach is best. For example, a group that lacks efficiency and productivity might benefit from a style that emphasizes order, rules, and clearly defined roles. A productive group of highly skilled workers, on the other hand, might benefit from a more democratic style that allows group members to work independently and have input in organizational decisions.The leader needs to consider the task itself. Tasks can range from simple to complex, but the leader needs to have a clear idea of exactly what the task entails in order to determine if it has been successfully and competently accomplished.The level of authority the leader has over group members should also be considered. Some leaders have power conferred by the position itself, such as the capacity to fire, hire, reward, or reprimand subordinates. Other leaders gain pow er through their relationships with employees, often by gaining respect from them, offering support to them, and helping them feel included in the decision-making process.As the Hersey-Blanchard model suggests, leaders need to consider the level of maturity of each individual group member. The maturity level is a measure of an individuals ability to complete a task, as well as his or her willingness to complete the task. Assigning a job to a member who is willing but lacks the ability is a recipe for failure. Being able to pinpoint each employees level of maturity allows the leader to choose the best leadership approach to help employees accomplish their goals.

Situational Theory of Leadership

Situational Theory of Leadership Theories Print The Situational Theory of Leadership By Kendra Cherry facebook twitter Kendra Cherry, MS, is an author, educational consultant, and speaker focused on helping students learn about psychology. Learn about our editorial policy Kendra Cherry Reviewed by Reviewed by Amy Morin, LCSW on October 01, 2019 facebook twitter instagram Amy Morin, LCSW, is a psychotherapist, author of the bestselling book 13 Things Mentally Strong People Dont Do, and a highly sought-after speaker. Learn about our Wellness Board Amy Morin, LCSW on October 01, 2019 Chris Ryan / Getty Images More in Theories Behavioral Psychology Cognitive Psychology Developmental Psychology Personality Psychology Social Psychology Biological Psychology Psychosocial Psychology In This Article Table of Contents Expand 4 Primary Leadership Styles Maturity Levels Leadership Styles and Maturity Flexible Leadership Model SLII Model SLII Leadership Styles Situational Factors View All Back To Top The situational theory of leadership suggests that no single leadership style is best. Instead, it all depends on the situation at hand and which type of leadership and strategies are best-suited to the task. According to this theory, the most effective leaders are those that are able to adapt their style to the situation and look at cues such as the type of task, the nature of the group, and other factors that might contribute to getting the job done. Situational leadership theory is often referred to as the Hersey-Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory, after its developers, Dr. Paul Hersey, author of The Situational Leader, and Kenneth Blanchard, author of One-Minute Manager. Hersey and Blanchard’s Leadership Styles Hersey and Blanchard suggested that there are four primary leadership styles: Telling (S1): In this leadership style, the leader tells people what to do and how to do it.Selling (S2): This style involves more back-and-forth between leaders and followers. Leaders sell their ideas and message to get group members to buy into the process.Participating (S3): In this approach, the leader offers less direction and allows members of the group to take a more active role in coming up with ideas and making decisions.Delegating (S4): This style is characterized by a less involved, hands-off approach to leadership. Group members tend to make most of the decisions and take most of the responsibility for what happens. Maturity Levels The right style of leadership depends greatly on the maturity level (i.e., the level of knowledge and competence) of the individuals or group. Hersey and Blanchards theory identifies four different levels of maturity, including: M1: Group members lack the knowledge, skills, and willingness to complete the task.M2: Group members are willing and enthusiastic, but lack the ability.M3: Group members have the skills and capability to complete the task, but are unwilling to take responsibility.M4: Group members are highly skilled and willing to complete the task. Matching Leadership Styles With Maturity Levels The Hersey-Blanchard model suggests that the following leadership styles are the most appropriate for these maturity levels: Low Maturity (M1)â€"Telling (S1)Medium Maturity (M2)â€"Selling (S2)Medium Maturity (M3)â€"Participating (S3)High Maturity (M4)â€"Delegating (S4) A Flexible Leadership Model A more telling style may be necessary at the beginning of a project when followers lack the responsibility or knowledge to work on their own. As subordinates become more experienced and knowledgeable, however, the leader may want to shift into a more delegating approach. This situational model of leadership focuses on flexibility so that leaders are able to adapt according to the needs of their followers and the demands of the situation. The situational approach to leadership also avoids the pitfalls of the single-style approach by recognizing that there are many different ways of dealing with a problem and that leaders need to be able to assess a situation and the maturity levels of subordinates in order to determine what approach will be the most effective at any given moment. Situational theories, therefore, give greater consideration to the complexity of dynamic social situations and the many individuals acting in different roles who will ultimately contribute to the outcome. The SLII Model The Situational Leadership II (or SLII model) was developed by Kenneth Blanchard and builds on Blanchard and Herseys original theory. According to the revised version of the theory, effective leaders must base their behavior on the developmental level of group members for specific tasks. The developmental level is determined by each individuals level of competence and commitment. These levels include: Enthusiastic Beginner (D1): High commitment, low competence.Disillusioned Learner (D2): Some competence, but setbacks have led to low commitment.Capable But Cautious Performer (D3): Competence is growing, but the level of commitment varies.Self-Reliant Achiever (D4): High competence and commitment. SLII Leadership Styles SLII also suggests that effective leadership is dependent on two key behaviors: supporting and directing. Directing behaviors include giving specific directions and instructions and attempting to control the behavior of group members. Supporting behaviors include actions such as encouraging subordinates, listening, and offering recognition and feedback. The theory identifies four basic leadership styles, including: Directing (S1): High on directing behaviors, low on supporting behaviors.Coaching (S2): High on both directing and supporting behaviors.Supporting (S3): Low on directing behavior and high on supporting behaviors.Delegating (S4): Low on both directing and supporting behaviors. The main point of SLII theory is that not one of these four leadership styles is best. Instead, an effective leader will match his or her behavior to the developmental skill of each subordinate for the task at hand. Important Situational Factors Experts suggest that there are four key contextual factors that leaders must be aware of when making an assessment of the situation. These factors include: Leaders need to consider the relationship between the leaders and the members of the group. Social and interpersonal factors can play a role in determining which approach is best. For example, a group that lacks efficiency and productivity might benefit from a style that emphasizes order, rules, and clearly defined roles. A productive group of highly skilled workers, on the other hand, might benefit from a more democratic style that allows group members to work independently and have input in organizational decisions.The leader needs to consider the task itself. Tasks can range from simple to complex, but the leader needs to have a clear idea of exactly what the task entails in order to determine if it has been successfully and competently accomplished.The level of authority the leader has over group members should also be considered. Some leaders have power conferred by the position itself, such as the capacity to fire, hire, reward, or reprimand subordinates. Other leaders gain pow er through their relationships with employees, often by gaining respect from them, offering support to them, and helping them feel included in the decision-making process.As the Hersey-Blanchard model suggests, leaders need to consider the level of maturity of each individual group member. The maturity level is a measure of an individuals ability to complete a task, as well as his or her willingness to complete the task. Assigning a job to a member who is willing but lacks the ability is a recipe for failure. Being able to pinpoint each employees level of maturity allows the leader to choose the best leadership approach to help employees accomplish their goals.

Beyonce As A Mediated Symbol - 1524 Words

Taylor Covington PID: 720409631 Comm 140 Paper #2 Bryanne Young Beyoncà © as a Mediated Symbol Beyoncà ©. She’s one of the world’s most beloved pop stars, idolized and respected by millions of women and men around the world. What is it that makes Beyoncà © Knowles â€Å"Queen B† among the young people of today’s society? To state it simply, it is her role as a mediated symbol. She is an idol of women empowerment and beauty. Beyoncà ©, as a powerful and renowned black woman, alters the pre-existing hegemonic ideology of â€Å"white male† equaling power and success in American society. In doing so, she also reinforces the more modern concepts of this Post-Fordist society by â€Å"keeping different from the Jones’†. Though some sources disagree, this essay will argue that because of society’s hegemonic ideology surrounding what constitutes power and the â€Å"ideal woman†, Beyoncà © has become a revolutionary symbol representing minority and women empowerment through the use of media. As an symbol she has and is continuing to demonstrate more modern ideological structures, which in turn demonstrates continuously changing societal ideologies. Before delving into the specifics as to what makes Beyoncà © a revolutionary mediated symbol, it is important to shed light onto exactly what it means to be a symbol. In his introduction to The Semiotics of Eating and Drinking (2012), Paul Manning defines a symbol as â€Å"a sign that stands for its object by convention alone,† (p.10). In America, when we see a photograph ofShow MoreRelatedSocial Media And Its Impact On Society2655 Words   |  11 Pagesgender, sexuality, and class, and develop vocabulary and formal concepts with which to discuss race. She outlined six aspects to racial literacy: (a) racism as a ‘contemporary problem rather than a historical legacy,’ (b) how race and racism are ‘mediated by class, gender inequality, and heterosexuality,’ (c) the â€Å"cultural and symbolic value of Whiteness,† (d) racial identities are learned, (e) a ‘racial grammar and vocabulary,’ and (f) how ‘to interpret racial codes an d racialized practices’ (TwineRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesCulture Creates Climate 516 †¢ Culture as a Liability 517 Creating and Sustaining Culture 519 How a Culture Begins 519 †¢ Keeping a Culture Alive 519 †¢ Summary: How Cultures Form 523 How Employees Learn Culture 523 Stories 523 †¢ Rituals 524 †¢ Material Symbols 524 †¢ Language 524 Creating an Ethical Organizational Culture 525 Creating a Positive Organizational Culture 527 Spirituality and Organizational Culture 529 What Is Spirituality? 529 †¢ Why Spirituality Now? 530 †¢ Characteristics of a Spiritual Organization

Biography Of James Harold Doolittle Raid - 871 Words

James Harold Doolittle lived from 1896 to 1993, died at age nighty-six year-old, and he dedicated almost eighty years in his life to aviation. Living through the First and the Second World Wars, Doolittle began his aviation career as an army pilot since he enrolled in the Signal Corps of the U.S. Army during the First World War. Doolittle soon found his talent and passion in aviation, which made him a famous pilot already in 1922 when he became the fist person who flew coast to coast in under twenty-four hours in the United States. In addition to his participation in aviation, Doolittle was the first to bring up the idea of flying through any conditions with obstacles to visibility, and he pioneered instrument flying and helped to develop instruments. Then in 1929, he took off, flew, and landed with only instruments, also known as â€Å"blind flight†. However, the event that made Doolittle household around the world was the Doolittle Raid, which was an aerial raid on the Japan ese homeland planned by him. By looking at the achievements of James Doolittle, people consider him one of the most important people in aviation. James Harold Doolittle was born on December 14th, 1896 in California; however, he spent his youth with his parents, Frank Henry Doolittle and Rosa Cerenah Shephard, in Nome, Alaska. Eventually James’s mother and him left Frank behind and returned to California, where James attended and graduated from Manual Arts High School in 1914. James attended to the

Low Hanging Fruit And Its Effects On The Education Of...

Virtually every school district in the country has been or is currently facing the need to reduce their budget. In the last two years, budget cuts have become far more common in school districts than ever recorded. Some schools are able to cushion the effects of the reductions by shifting fundings around or pulling out reserves, but there is no debate to the fact that these cuts have, in one way or another, a negative impact on the education of students in school districts. Some strategies to reduce fundings in schools are easier to approach rather than others. In many school districts, the emphasis is put unto reducing individual budget line items. An example of one of these convenient strategies is cutting off â€Å"low-hanging fruit†. Some fruit trees may have branches with fruits lower to the ground easier for humans and animals to pick off with little effort; this fruit aptly being named â€Å"low-hanging fruit.† In budgeting, the term is used to identify items in a budget that might be easily accumulated without significantly disturbing the operation of the school or district. Two common examples include reducing office supplies or increasing the cost of school lunches. The problem with low-hanging fruit is that most of these reductions have barely any impact on the overall budget, with little to no change in the budget whatsoever. As no process to reduce budgets is described as ideal, some districts are able to off-put the adversity of the cuts this way, but these practicesShow MoreRelatedBangladesh National Budget Analysis16928 Words   |  68 PagesLetter of Transmittal: 12th August, 2012 Muhammad Enamul Haque Assistant Professor School of Business and Economics United International University Subject: Submission of the term paper on â€Å"Analysis of Bangladesh National Budget For the FY 2012-13† Sir, Here is the term paper on â€Å"Analysis of Bangladesh National Budget 2012-13†, which you have assigned us in order to get a clear understanding over Bangladesh National Budget for FY2012-13. We have tried our best to gather all kinds of relevantRead MoreFactors Affecting the Cultural Beliefs of Tagakaulo Tribe in Southern Mindanao7929 Words   |  32 Pageslive in Mt. Apo. The Tagakaulos bring with them human sacrifices to this spirit of good and bad, especially when they imagine that he is angered or when they come to the volcano to gather sulphur. Each upland river valley or highland plain was the district or domain of a ruling datu, a position which was inherited by primogeniture. The datu was both judge and defender of his fellowmen, who in turn worked his fields. A wealthy datu could have as many wives as he could secure, either by capture or byRead MoreVWT Task 1 1014 Essay5448 Words   |  22 Pagesof the county. (City-Data, 2014) The median household income in 2013 was estimated to be close to $60,000 and 12 percent of residents are living below the poverty level. (US Census Bureau, 2014) Blacks and African Americans make up the majority of low-income people despite the fact that they comprise only 7 percent of the County population. The majority of residents (76.5 percent) are white, 10 percent are non-black Hispanics and 6 percent are Asians. The median resident age is 35 years and 12 percentRead MoreConsumer Lifestyle in Singapore35714 Words   |  143 Pages....... 4 School Life ................................... ............................................................................................. 4 University Life ........................................................................................................................... 6 Adult Learning .......................................................................................................................... 8 Chart 2 Chart 3 Number of Students in Higher Education and ExpenditureRead MoreJunk Food10479 Words   |  42 Pagessolutions, for advocates, parents and youth Activities Brainstorming Mapping Framing Strategizing Worksheets Talking about food and beverage marketing that targets kids Developing strategy worksheet Sample letter to a merchant Sample letter to an after-school program 6 7 Talking Points and QA Resources 4 Fighting Junk Food Marketing to Kids | bmsg.org 1 Introduction 1 Introduction Why we developed this toolkit, how you can use it 1 Introduction 1 Introduction Imagine, ifRead MoreBottom of the Pyramid9096 Words   |  37 Pages(BOP) proposition, where private companies can both be proï ¬ table and help alleviate poverty by attending low-income consumers. Design/methodology/approach – The literature on BOP was reviewed and some key elements of the BOP approach were proposed and examined. Findings – There is no agreement in the literature about the potential beneï ¬ ts of the BOP approach for both private companies and low-income consumers. However, further research on characterizing the BOP segment and ï ¬ nding the appropriateRead MorePurpose of Evaluating Customer Service Policies26269 Words   |  106 PagesManual on Module II Introduction to Hospitality By Authors Mr Murray Mackenzie School of Hotel Tourism Management The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Dr Benny Chan Hong Kong Community College The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Consultant Mr Tony Tse School of Hotel Tourism Management The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Introduction to Hospitality Copyright  © The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region All rights reserved. The copyrightRead MorePurpose of Evaluating Customer Service Policies26276 Words   |  106 PagesManual on Module II Introduction to Hospitality By Authors Mr Murray Mackenzie School of Hotel Tourism Management The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and Dr Benny Chan Hong Kong Community College The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Consultant Mr Tony Tse School of Hotel Tourism Management The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Introduction to Hospitality Copyright  © The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region All rights reserved. The copyright of this manual belongsRead MoreIkea Case Study on Marketing22843 Words   |  92 PagesUniversity of Halmstad School of Business and Engineering Bachelor Degree A creation of competitive advantage by using differentiation of company’s strategy actions. The case study of IKEA Sweden with experiences on Chinese and French markets. Dissertation in Marketing Credit point level – 10 ( 15ECTS) Supervisor: Venilton Reinert Authors: Landry Capdevielle Min Li Paulina Nogal Halmstad, 23rd of May 2007 The table of contents Introduction............................................Read MoreIgbo Dictionary129408 Words   |  518 PagesDoes not include an English-Igbo finderlist 2. Is very comprehensive (the Igbo-English section is pages 1-845) and draws on many dialects with particular emphasis on Central dialects. 3. Marks vowels with subdots as in the present manuscript 4. Marks low, downstep, rising and falling tones leaving high unmarked as in the present manuscript. 5. Has limited scientific names and technical vocabulary. The most striking feature of Igwe is that because it includes words from many dialects, it symbolises the